Legal Opinion
Duncan v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 18, 1979No. 10-75PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, Judge
Plaintiffs, Pomo Indians of the Robinson Ranchería in Northern California, have attacked the termination by the United States of their ranchería status in 1965. In the companion district court case against the Secretary of the Interior (and other federal officials), Duncan v. Andrus, Nos. C-71-1572 and C-71-1713 (N.D. Cal. March 22, 1977), they obtained declaratory and injunctive relief grounded on that court’s determination that the termination was unlawful. In the present suit (initially part of the District Court litigation but transferred here under 28 U.S.C. § 1406 (c)), claimants seek…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Carruth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Navajo Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Duncan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Alabama Hospital Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.