Legal Opinion

Corken v. Workman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 1936PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, J.

On April 27, 1936, the plaintiffs in error filed in this conrt their application for a writ of error directed to the Circuit Court of Andrew County, requiring that a transcript of all of the proceedings lately thereon had in said court in a cause therein heard, wherein Thomas A. Corken and Anniee Corken were the plaintiffs and Joseph T. Workman, Lnln W. Staples, and William G. Sawyers, trustee, were the defendants, be transmitted to this conrt for review and for the correction of errors therein and in the judgment.

On such date, the’ application was granted; and a writ of error was ordered and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carlin v. WolffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  2. Davis v. HartwigSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. Owen v. FordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hribernik v. Reorganized School District R-3Missouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. LAWYERS'ASSOCIATION OF ST. LOUIS v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Euclid Terrace Corp. v. GOLTERMAN ENTERPRISES, INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Personal Finance Co. v. DaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  5. Eichelsbach v. HardingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API