Legal Opinion

Cantrell v. MAYOR &C. OF MT. AIRY

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 11, 1963No. 21901, 21902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mobley, Justice.(a) “Equity will take no part in the administration of the criminal law. It will neither aid criminal *649courts in the exercise of their jurisdiction, nor will it restrain or obstruct them.” Code § 55-102; Gault v. Wallis, 53 Ga. 675 (4); Phillips v. Mayor &c. of Stone Mountain, 61 Ga. 386; Garrison v. City of Atlanta, 68 Ga. 64; Pope v. Mayor &c. of Savannah, 74 Ga. 365; Landers v. Georgia Public Service Commission, 217 Ga. 804, 813 (125 SE2d 495). The rule stated in Code § 55-102 really admits of no exception. Jewel Tea Co. v. City Council of Augusta, 183 Ga. 817, 818 (190 SE…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. City of Atlanta v. Gate City Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Cutsinger v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  4. Mayor of Shellman v. SaxonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  5. Phillips v. Mayor of Stone MountainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Woodside v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  2. Cantrell v. MAYOR &C. OF MT. AIRYSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API