Cantrell v. MAYOR &C. OF MT. AIRY
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Mobley, Justice.(a) “Equity will take no part in the administration of the criminal law. It will neither aid criminal *649courts in the exercise of their jurisdiction, nor will it restrain or obstruct them.” Code § 55-102; Gault v. Wallis, 53 Ga. 675 (4); Phillips v. Mayor &c. of Stone Mountain, 61 Ga. 386; Garrison v. City of Atlanta, 68 Ga. 64; Pope v. Mayor &c. of Savannah, 74 Ga. 365; Landers v. Georgia Public Service Commission, 217 Ga. 804, 813 (125 SE2d 495). The rule stated in Code § 55-102 really admits of no exception. Jewel Tea Co. v. City Council of Augusta, 183 Ga. 817, 818 (190 SE…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- City of Atlanta v. Gate City Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Cutsinger v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Mayor of Shellman v. SaxonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Phillips v. Mayor of Stone MountainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Woodside v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
- Cantrell v. MAYOR &C. OF MT. AIRYSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963