Legal Opinion

Marlow v. C. Schmidt & Sons, Inc.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Carbon County

Decided August 21, 1975No. 99Published

1Opinion of the Court

HEIMBACH, P. J.,

Plaintiff s complaint is that immediately after consuming several ounces of Schmidt’s bottled beer he became nauseated because the beer was improperly brewed and contained seeds and a large swollen hop. As a result he suffered a severe shock to his nervous system and attendant emotional suffering and distress.

The thrust of defendant’s prehminary objections in the nature of a demurrer and a motion for a more specific complaint is that emotional distress, unaccompanied by an injury, is not compensable, citing Young v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 15 F. Supp. 1018 (1936).

In…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Niederman v. BrodskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Wisniewski v. GREAT A. & P. TEA. CO.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Wisniewski v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Young v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API