Marlow v. C. Schmidt & Sons, Inc.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Carbon County
1Opinion of the Court
HEIMBACH, P. J.,
Plaintiff s complaint is that immediately after consuming several ounces of Schmidt’s bottled beer he became nauseated because the beer was improperly brewed and contained seeds and a large swollen hop. As a result he suffered a severe shock to his nervous system and attendant emotional suffering and distress.
The thrust of defendant’s prehminary objections in the nature of a demurrer and a motion for a more specific complaint is that emotional distress, unaccompanied by an injury, is not compensable, citing Young v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 15 F. Supp. 1018 (1936).
In…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Niederman v. BrodskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Wisniewski v. GREAT A. & P. TEA. CO.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Wisniewski v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Young v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1936