Legal Opinion

Jane M. Lassek, and Michael E. Smith, Intervenor v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided October 28, 2019No. 25395-16Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

T.C. Memo. 2019-145

UNITED STATES TAX COURT JANE M. LASSEK, Petitioner, AND MICHAEL E. SMITH, Intervenor v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 25395-16. Filed October 28, 2019. Albert B. Kerkhove and Howard N. Kaplan, for petitioner. Michael E. Smith, pro se. Britton G. Wilson and Douglas S. Polsky, for respondent. MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION PARIS, Judge: Pursuant to section 6015(e)(1),1 petitioner seeks review of respondent’s determination that she is not entitled to relief from joint and several 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cheshire v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  2. Alt v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2002
  3. Kathryn Cheshire v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  4. Alt v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. Patricia A. Price v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API