Patricia A. Price v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
This appeal turns on interpretation of the defense to joint federal income tax liability known as the “innocent spouse” provision of the Internal Revenue Code. The wife-taxpayer asserts that the tax court erred by applying an incorrect standard in determining that she was ineligible for relief under this provision. She claims that she was “innocent” within the meaning of the provision at the time she signed the return, and thus should be shielded from liability as to the tax deficiency arising from a deduction as to which her husband-taxpayer had superior knowledge.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bettye A. Sanders v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Sonnenborn v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
- Joyce Purcell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Mysse v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
- Madeline M. Stevens v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by124 opinions
- United States v. Sakhawat Ullah, Jr., United States of America v. Mary Katherine Gosho-KimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Bokum v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1990
- Kathryn Cheshire v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. S. Mohammad MarashiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Jonson v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2002
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.