Legal Opinion

R. E. Hood v. Ruby Gay Hood

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 16, 1964No. 7556PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

R. E. Hood and Ruby Gay Hood were husband and wife. Their marriage was dissolved by a decree granting her a divorce. Prior to the divorce, they entered into a property settlement agreement. Mrs. Hood brought this action against Hood to recover damages for deceit, alleging that she was induced by fraud practiced upon her by Hood to enter into the property settlement agreement. From a judgment for Mrs. Hood, he has appealed.

The facts appear in the record only in the findings of the trial court, which are not challenged.

The Hoods were married in March, 1940. Two children…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chisholm v. HouseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  2. United States National Bank v. BartgesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  3. Chanin v. Chevrolet Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  4. McWilliams v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  5. French v. FrenchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ingvoldstad v. Estate of YoungDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1982
  2. Altergott v. YeagerColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Oehme v. OehmeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
  4. Jessie L. Finkbiner v. Robert W. FinkbinerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  5. Robinson v. RobinsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API