Legal Opinion

Oceguera v. Cohen

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 2009No. B205608PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TURNER, P. J.—

I. INTRODUCTION

Business and Professions Code 1 section 7031, subdivision (b) permits a consumer to sue an unlicensed contractor for a refund of moneys paid under a construction contract. Such a refund claim is subject to the defense the unlicensed contractor was in “substantial compliance” with the licensing requirement. The four elements of the substantial compliance defense of an unlicensed contractor to a consumer’s refund claim are specified in section 7031, subdivision (e). In this case, we conclude substantial evidence supports the trial court’s express and implied…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. In Re Zacharia D.California Supreme Court · 1993
  5. MW Erectors, Inc. v. Niederhauser Ornamental & Metal Works Co.California Supreme Court · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ahdout v. HekmatjahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Judicial Council v. Jacobs Facilities, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Judicial Council of Cal. v. Jacobs FacilitiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. San Francisco CDC LLC v. Webcor Construction L.P.California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API