Legal Opinion

Wilkinson v. Bell

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1946No. 8622PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cheadle

Action by Adele Wilkinson against F. M. Bell and Sam J. Bukvich, a mining co-partnership, doing business under the firm name and style of Bell & Bukvich. The amended complaint consists of twenty-two causes of action for the recovery of various amounts represented by promissory notes, each payable to the ■order of plaintiff, and executed by “Bell & Bukvich, By F. M. Bell.”

The causes of action are similar with the exception of the dates and amounts of the notes sued upon, and substantially allege that F. M. Bell and Sam J. Bukvich are, and at all times therein mentioned were, mining…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Skillman v. LachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  2. St. George v. BoucherMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Lackman v. SimpsonMontana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Green v. City of RoundupMontana Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Daily v. FitzgeraldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bennett v. DodgsonMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Schaff v. ShaulesMontana Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Bennett v. DodgsonMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Calcote v. GriffithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API