Legal Opinion

Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance v. Borough of Bellmawr

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 25, 2002PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

STEIN, J.

This appeal raises two important issues relating to environmental pollution liability. First, we must determine under the “continuous trigger theory” of liability whether an insurance policy in effect at the time the Borough of Bellmawr (Borough) was depositing waste in a landfill provides coverage for resulting environmental pollution claims against the Borough. Although the trial record reveals that contaminants from the landfill could not have begun to be dispersed into the surrounding groundwater until *412after Century Indemnity Company’s…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Zurich Insurance Co. v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  4. Sentinel Insurance Co. v. First Insurance Co. of Hawai'i, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  5. United States Gypsum Co. v. Admiral InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Benjamin Moore & Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  2. Farmers Mutual Fire Insurance v. New Jersey Property-Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  3. Towns v. Northern Security InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  4. Polarome International, Inc. v. Greenwich Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  5. Spaulding Composites Co. v. Aetna Cas. and Surety Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API