Reed v. Fish Engineering Corporation
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Dissent
LaFEL E. OMAN, Judge, Court of Appeals
(dissenting).
I am unable to agree with the majority of the court in the disposition they make of the first point, which is that the plaintiff’s claim for workmen’s compensation benefits, aside from medical benefits, is not barred by the provisions of § 59-10-13.6, N.M.S.A. 1953.
The majority dispose of the first issue, and in particular dispose of the question of the applicability of the provisions of § 59-10-14, N.M.S.A.1953 to the facts of this case, by stating that this issue is controlled by the opinion on the first appeal, since that opinion is now…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stambaugh v. HayesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- Mitchell v. AllisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
- Bolt v. DavisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Posey v. DoveNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- Putnam v. United States Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.