Legal Opinion
Furtick v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 19, 2007No. 06-AA-274PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, Associate Judge:
Petitioner William Furtick seeks review of a decision of the District of Columbia Department of Employment Services (“DOES”), Compensation Review Board (“CRB”) which affirmed an Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) compensation order under the District of Columbia Workers’ Compensation Act (“the- Act” or “WCA”). Mr. Furtick challenges the conclusion of the ALJ, affirmed by the CRB, that DOES has no jurisdiction in his case because his employment at the time of his workplace injury was not principally located in the District of Columbia since his employment duties were…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Pittston Stevedoring Corp. v. DellaventuraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Dell v. Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Smith v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Hughes v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shipkey v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Lincoln Hockey, LLC v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010