Department of Labor & Industry v. Ganc
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
NARICK, Senior Judge.
The issue on appeal is whether the Pennsylvania Prevailing Wage Appeals Board (Board) correctly interpreted the Pennsylvania Prevailing Wage Act (Act)1 as requiring the Bureau of Labor Law Compliance, Department of Labor and Industry (Department) to hold an “appropriate hearing” whenever a workman files a protest alleging he has been underpaid in violation of the Act. We hold the Board correctly interpreted the Act as requiring the Department hold an “appropriate hearing” whenever a workman files a protest under the Act. Therefore, the decision and order of the Board is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Oberneder v. Link Computer Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Coretsky v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- York Excavating Co. v. Pennsylvania Prevailing Wage Appeals BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Pennsylvania Ass'n of Rehabilitation Facilities v. FosterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mistick Construction v. Department of Labor & Industry, Prevailing Wage Appeals BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000