Legal Opinion

Townsend v. Holman Consulting Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 6, 1990No. Nos. 87-5825, 87-6154PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Fred Wright, attorney for the Town-sends, appeals two orders of the district court imposing sanctions under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. He argues that even though he signed pleadings containing certain frivolous requests for relief, the pleadings nonetheless could not be the subject of sanctions because they also included certain non-frivolous requests for relief. A three-judge panel of this court, struggling with seemingly inconsistent decisions concerning Rule 11 sanctions, ruled in Wright’s favor and reversed *1139the orders imposing sanctions.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Golden Eagle Distributing Corporation v. Burroughs Corporation, and Kirkland & EllisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Oliveri v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  5. Cross & Cross Properties, Ltd., Cross-Appellant v. Everett Allied Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Price v. HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Ruiz v. City of Santa MariaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Stitt v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Matthew Lockary v. Paul Kayfetz Victor Amoroso Mary Lowry Diana Lopez Fransworth Frederick B. McClellan Peter Warshall v. Pacific Legal FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. In Re Hayes Microcomputer Products, Inc. Patent Litigation. Ven-Tel, Inc. v. Hayes Microcomputer Products, Inc., Defendant/cross-Appellant. Hayes Microcomputer Products, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Ven-Tel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API