Legal Opinion

Newton v. Marshall

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1884PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Fond du Lao Count}'-. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

This is an action by the respondent to recover damages for trespass upon real estate claimed to be owned by her. The defendants 'answered by a general denial, and by setting up title in Mary W. Marshall to the real estate upon which the plaintiff alleges the trespass was committed. The plaintiff had judgment upon a trial in the circuit court by the court without a jury. From such judgment the defendants appealed to this court.

i, The only questions to be determined by this court upon this appeal are whether the plaintiff gave sufficient evidence of her actual possession of the real estate upon…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fallass v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Smith v. LewisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Wickes v. LakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Avery v. JuddWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Fisk v. BrunetteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brown v. GriswoldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Hannig v. MuellerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Lego v. MedleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Bartel v. IngramSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  5. J. & S. CORP. v. Mortgage Associates, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API