Legal Opinion

Hannig v. Mueller

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1892PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Milwaukee County. This action was commenced March 5, 1890. The complaint, among other things, alleges, in effect, that on and prior to April 25, 1860, Carl Mueller and Elizabeth Mueller, his wife, and John F. W. Mueller and the defendant Ma-thilda, his wife, owned and held the legal title to the premises described, and executed and delivered to one Yictor Koenemann a quitclaim deed of the same, which was recorded ; that on the same day…

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Milwaukee County. This action was commenced March 5, 1890. The complaint, among other things, alleges, in effect, that on and prior to April 25, 1860, Carl Mueller and Elizabeth Mueller, his wife, and John F. W. Mueller and the defendant Ma-thilda, his wife, owned and held the legal title to the premises described, and executed and delivered to one Yictor Koenemann a quitclaim deed of the same, which was recorded ; that on the same day Koenemann and wife executed and delivered to the said John F. W. Mueller a deed of the same premises, which was recorded;…

1Opinion of the CourtCassoday, J.

The findings of fact mentioned in the foregoing statement are fully sustained by the evidence. The deed from Carl and Elizabeth Mueller, and John E. W. Muéller and wife to Koenemann, and the deed from Koene-mann and wife back to John F. W. Mueller, and the bond or declaration of trust of John F. W. Mueller back to Carl and Elizabeth Mueller, each and all related to the same subject matter and were executed substantially at the same time, to wit, April 25, 1860, and for the same common purpose, and must, therefore, in determining the character of the transaction and the intention of the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Riggs v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. New York Mutual Life Insurance v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Joy v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Winner v. HoytWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Owens v. . OwensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Allen v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Hoyt v. LightbodySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Davenport v. StephensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Boyle v. KempkinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Rothschild v. DickinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API