Legal Opinion

Decuir v. Carnes

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 3, 1931No. 31513PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOdom, J.

The facts certified by the judges of the Court of Appeal In the above-styled ease are as follows:

Jeff Prados owns 63 arpents of land in the parish of Iberia. It seems that he purchased 31% arpents of this land at one time and the balance on another date, and while the two purchases were separate, the land acquired in both comprises one tract.

But as some of the mortgages involved in this suit operate on the 63-arpent tract as a whole and others on one or the other of the parts separately, the separate parts, for convenience, are designated “A” and “B.”

Jeff Prados, the landowner, is indebted to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zeigler v. His CreditorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1896
  2. R. M. Walmsley & Co. v. TheusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  3. Duchamp v. DantillySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1854
  4. Baldwin v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1834
  5. King v. DwightSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Marquette Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. ThomsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  3. RF MESTAYER LUMBER COMPANY v. CusackLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. White System of Alexandria v. FitzhughLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Peart v. Rykoski, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API