Legal Opinion

Furnas v. Friday

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1885No. 11,586PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Porter Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The third paragraph of the appellee’s complaint, omitting the formal parts, reads thus : “ The plaintiff was desirous of purchasing and stocking his farm with a number of good, healthy, sound sheep, in addition to the flock he then owned and had on said farm, and the defendant, hearing of plaintiff’s desire to so purchase sheep, represented and stated to him that he, the defendant, had a flock of good, healthy, sound sheep, free from disease of all kind, and caused plaintiff to look at said sheep, which then appeared sound and free from disease, and the defendant repeated his representation…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bethell v. BethellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Frenzel v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Booher v. GoldsboroughIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. West v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Krewson v. CloudIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kirkpatrick v. ReevesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Automobile Underwriters, Inc. v. RichIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Coffey v. WiningerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Smart & Perry Ford Sales, Inc. v. WeaverIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. New v. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API