Legal Opinion
Sears v. Board of Trust. of Anton Chico Land Grant
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided December 27, 1971No. 9274PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OMAN, Justice.
Plaintiffs filed suit to quiet title to a certain tract of land situate within the Spiess and Davis Subdivision of the Anton Chico Land Grant. The named defendants were the Board-of Trustees of the Anton Chico Land Grant and others. Of these, only the ■Board has appealed. A group of residents and claimants of the Grant petitioned for leave to intervene, but their petition was denied.
This appeal is by the Board from the Judgment and Decree quieting title in plaintiffs and from the refusal of the trial court to vacate the Board’s default or grant a new trial, and by those…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mora v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- Rogers v. Lyle Adjustment CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Adams & McGahey v. NeillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
- Wooley v. WickerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- Springer Corporation v. American Leasing CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Herrera v. Springer CorporationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Alfred v. AndersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
- Smith v. Trailways, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- Tres Ladrones, Inc. v. FitchNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- Maestas v. Board of Trustees of Anton Chico Land GrantNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.