Legal Opinion
Mantz v. Follingstad
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided November 22, 1972No. 954Published
1Opinion of the Court
505 P.2d 68 (1972)
84 N.M. 473
Georgia Ann MANTZ and Joseph C. Mantz, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
A. H. FOLLINGSTAD, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 954.
Court of Appeals of New Mexico.
November 22, 1972.
Rehearing Denied December 19, 1972.
Donald C. Turpen, Turpen, Hunt & Booth, Albuquerque, for appellants.
Donald L. Jones, K. Gill Shaffer, Shaffer, Butt & Bass, Albuquerque, for appellee.
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for defendant after jury verdict. The issues submitted to the jury were whether defendant departed from certain accepted standards of medical practice, limited to disclosing…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Loucks v. Albuquerque National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Rockhill v. PollardOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Cervantes v. ForbisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- W. C. Case v. Dan C. AbramsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Mantz v. FollingstadNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.