Legal Opinion

State v. Roenisch

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 14, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from AllamaJcee District Court. — Hon. Charles T. Granger, Judge. This is an action in equity in the name of the state to enjoin and abate a nuisance which it is alleged the defendants maintained by the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquors. There was a hearing upon the merits, and a decree was entered against the defendant, and they appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.

The abstract of appellants does not purport to be an abstract of all the evidence in the case. Counsel for appellee filed an abstract in which some evidence is set out, but it is stated therein that the two abstracts, taken together, do not contain all the evidence offered or introduced on the trial. It also appears that the translation of the short-hand notes taken by the reporter at the trial was not filed in the court below within six months from the rendition of the decree. In this state of the record, the cause cannot be heard upon appeal in this court. Merrill v. Bowe, 69 Iowa, 653;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Merrill v. BoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  2. Arts v. CulbertsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Calef v. ColeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  2. Turner v. Ottumwa Railway Electric & Steam Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  3. Independent District v. RossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API