Turner v. Ottumwa Railway Electric & Steam Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Wapello District Court. — Hon. J. C. Mitchell, Judge, Action at law to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s Intestate. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s testimony, the court, on motion of defendant, directed the jury to return a verdict for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.
In order to determine the questions presented by this appeal, we must have all the testimony adduced upon the hearing. Appellant has filed an abstract which he claims presents all the evidence introduced upon the trial. Appellee filed an amended abstract, denying that appellant’s abstract contains all the evidence, orAhat-it correctly abstracts the evidence. In his amended abstract *716the appellee supplies some additional testimony, “without,” as he says, “intending to supply all the omitted evidence in the plaintiff’s abstract,” and says that the two together do not contain all the •evidence.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Marsh v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Carson & Rand Lumber Co. v. Knapp, Stout & Co. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Goode v. StearnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- State v. RoenischSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kunz v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Clark v. TracySupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Wilmering v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895