Legal Opinion
United States v. Lichtenberg
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 27, 2011No. 09-10191PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAWKINS, Senior Circuit Judge:
In this sentencing appeal, defendant Andrew Lichtenberg (“Lichtenberg”) challenges his 112-month sentence, imposed following a remand from this court, for wire fraud, money laundering, and making a false statement in connection with a passport application, arguing the district court improperly calculated his criminal history points, improperly imposed an above-Guidelines sentence for factors already taken into consideration by the Guidelines, and imposed a substantively unreasonable sentence. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Lichtenberg was convicted…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Zameer Nooralla Mohamed, AKA Al, AKA Samier Hussain, AKA Zameer MohamedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Amezcua-VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. TreadwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Hernandez-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. LandaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Juventino GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Victor Gonzalez VazquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Paige ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- United States v. Saturnino Ortiz-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.