Legal Opinion
Abram v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.
Texas Supreme Court
Decided January 19, 1892No. 3059PublishedCited by 10 opinions
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
COLLARD, Judge,
Section A.-—The statement of the nature and re-. suit of the suit as made in appellant’s brief and accepted by appellee is as follows:
“This is an action for damages for the forcible and wrongful ejection of the plaintiff Abram from the defendant’s train, on the 26th of March, 1889. Defendant pleaded the general issue. But the defense is, that plaintiff tendered to the conductor a round trip or excursion ticket from Lufkin, Angelina County, to Galveston and return, issued by the Houston East & West Texas Railway Company over its own line and that of the defendant, which ticket…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- W. A. Ryan & Co. v. M., K. & T. R'y Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
- Quimby v. . VanderbiltNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Mosher v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Downs v. New York & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869
- Pennington v. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
3Cited by10 opinions
- Boling v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- Dangerfield v. Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1900
- Prætorians v. KruszTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n v. LovenbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
- Fish Bros. Wagon v. G. F. Adams Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.