Legal Opinion

Huntington v. Palmer

United States Circuit Court

Decided July 1, 1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sawyer, G. J.

This is a bill in equity brought by a stockholder of the Central Pacific Railroad Company, on behalf of himself and all other stockholders who shall come in and contribute to the expense of the suit against the corporation and the tax collector of Alameda county, to enjoin the collection of a state and county tax, as being illegal and unconstitutional on various grounds, and as such utterly and in toto void. The defendant Palmer demurs to the bill for want of equity. The bill contains the usual allegations of such bills brought by stockholders, but it fails to allege the payment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Stark v. StarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Couts v. CornellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Welch v. Clatsop CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  3. DeMille v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API