DeMille v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The plaintiffs began this action for the purpose of recovering tax moneys alleged to have been paid under protest, and also to have declared void an assessment levied by the County of Los Angeles upon the properties of the respective plaintiffs. The defendant interposed a demurrer to the plaintiffs’ complaint, setting forth two grounds:
1st. That said complaint did not state sufficient facts to constitute a cause of action as to any of the plaintiffs; and
2d. That there was a misjoinder of parties-plaintiff.
The court overruled the defendant’s demurrer, and the defendant failing to answer,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- National Bank v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Merrill v. HumphreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Riley v. MartinelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- County of Los Angeles v. BallerinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Security-First National Bank v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Simms v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Mandel v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United Insurance of Chicago v. MaloneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Mandel v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.