Legal Opinion
Scott v. Dixie Homecrafters
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided December 27, 2000No. CIV. A. 00-D-134-EPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DE MENT, District Judge.
Before the court is Defendant Dixie Ho-mecrafters’ Motion For Summary Judgment, which was filed October 23, 2000 along with a supporting brief. Plaintiff filed a Response on November 13, and Defendant issued a Reply on November 20. After careful consideration of the arguments of counsel, the relevant law, and the record as a whole, the court finds that Defendant’s Motion is due to be granted in part and denied in part.
I.JURISDICTION AND VENUE
The court exercises subject matter jurisdiction over these claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fitzpatrick v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alphamed Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. Arriva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2006
- Dinkins v. Charoen Pokphand USA, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001
- KW Plastics v. United States Can Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001
- Knight & Son Transportation, Inc. v. Volvo Group North America, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2021
- NTA Graphics South Inc v. Axiom Impressions LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.