Legal Opinion

McClelland v. Hyundai Motor America

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 1994No. Civ. A. No. 93-3399PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOYNER, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is the motion of plaintiff Roger Bieros, for default judgment pursuant to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff, a pro se prisoner incarcerated at the state correctional institution located in Graterford, Pennsylvania, seeks default judgment against all police officers named in the original complaint as defendants1 on the basis that they failed to respond, defend, plead or otherwise answer the allegations raised in the complaint. However, for the following reasons, we will deny plaintiffs motion.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eli L. Medunic and Dolores M. Medunic v. Louis W. LedererCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. Spica v. GarczynskiDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Nash v. SignoreDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Ticketron, Division of Control Data Corp. v. Record Museum, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Hyundai Motor AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. DEBRA F. FINK v. Ricoh Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  3. Neff v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Kruger v. Subaru of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. In Re Partners Group Financial, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API