Legal Opinion

Barry G. Simmons v. Amerada Hess Corporation and Brown & Root, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 18, 1980No. 78-3650PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This case involves a settled doctrine of Mississippi negligence law: An act which merely furnishes the condition or occasion upon which injuries are received, but which does not put in motion the agency by or through which the injuries are inflicted, does not constitute the proximate cause of the harm. Mississippi City Lines, Inc. v. Bullock, 194 Miss. 630, 13 So.2d 34, 36 (1943). Based on this doctrine, we affirm the district court’s entry of summary judgment against an injured plaintiff in favor of defendant, and decide that defendant’s motion was not premature, as argued by plaintiff,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mississippi City Lines, Inc. v. BullockMississippi Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Permenter v. Milner Chevrolet Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1956
  3. EI DuPONT DE NEM. & CO. v. LadnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Saucier v. WalkerMississippi Supreme Court · 1967
  5. City of Laurel v. UptonMississippi Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Eckman v. MooreMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  2. FOSTER BY FOSTER v. BassMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,607 Louis E. Wolfson v. John D. Baker, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. M & M Pipe & Pres. Vessel Fab., Inc. v. RobertsMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Dumas v. Pike County, Miss.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API