Legal Opinion
Tateosian v. Celebrity Cruise Services, Ltd.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided April 12, 2001No. 99-517-AppealPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The decisive issue in this case is whether the terms of a cruise contract were fundamentally unfair and specifically, its forum selection clause. Barbara Tateosian (Barbara) and Glenn Tateosian (Glenn) (collectively, plaintiffs) have appealed a summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Celebrity Cruise Services, Ltd. (Celebrity) and the dismissal of them negligence claim against Celebrity. 1 This case came before the Supreme Court for oral argument on March 8, 2001, pursuant to an order directing the parties to show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Mary Lousararian v. Royal Caribbean Corp., as Successor in Interest to Royal Caribbean LimitedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Kathryn J. Shankles v. Costa Armatori, S.P.A., Isolina Vazquez GastonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Kirby v. Planning Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Mosby v. DevineSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
- Lamarque v. Centreville Sayings BankSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
- Sidell v. SidellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
- D'ALLESANDRO v. TarroSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
- Edge Telecom, Inc. v. Sterling BankColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.