Legal Opinion

Alexander Eccles & Co. v. Louisville & N. R.

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided August 2, 1912No. 1,836PublishedCited by 2 opinions

At Law. Action by Alexander Eccles & Company against the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company. On motion of plaintiff for new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

GRUBB, District Judge.

The plaintiff relied in support of its motion for a new trial exclusively upon its exception'to the following portion of the court’s oral charge to the jury:

“One principle of law I omitted-to call your attention to in my charge. I said that notice to Bywater of irregularities that might be sufficient to charge him with knowledge that these were spurious bills of lading of the character the evidence disclosed if he were the proper kind of agent, that is, one authorized to receive the notice, would be notice to the company. I want to qualify that to this extent: Where an…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Friedlander v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Frenkel v. HudsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  5. First National Bank v. Town of New MilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. JC Jacobs Banking Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Gleason v. Bamberg E. & W. Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API