Legal Opinion

Apartment & Hotel Financing Corp. v. Will

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 20, 1924No. Civ. No. 4748PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

The city of Los Angeles instituted proceedings in eminent domain against the petitioner herein and others, and, issue having .been joined, it was stipulated that referees be appointed by the court to determine the issues and report findings and judgment. Thereafter it was ordered that the respondents take the evidence to determine the issues and report to the court in writing their findings and a judgment.

Another suit was pending between Renno Brush and the petitioner herein, asserting a lien upon the leasehold interest of the latter in certain of the property sought to be condemned.

Hearings…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Van Hoosear v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Traffic Truck Sales Co. v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. In Re Proving the Alleged Last Will & Testament of HathawayNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Kossuth County State Bank v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. Grout v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Superior Court of Orange CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. C. S. Smith Metropolitan Market Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Lindsey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. City of Pasadena v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Klement v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API