Legal Opinion

A. T. E. Financial Services, Inc. v. Corson

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 10, 1970PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fritz, J. S. C.

This is a mortgage foreclosure action. Defendant Marine National .Bank contests plaintiff’s right to foreclosure on the basis that plaintiff, A. T. E. Financial Services, Inc., being a limited partner of defendants-mortgagors at the time the mortgage was given, is proscribed from the taking of such a security by the terms of N. J. S. A. 42 :2—17. This defendant seeks summary judgment to that effect. The sole issue on this motion concerns itself with construction of N. J. S. A. 42:2-17.

For the purposes of this motion, it appears that plaintiff-mortgagee was in fact a limited…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. David Hughes, Trustee v. Evelyn DashCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kramer v. McDonald's System, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Adams v. SlonimCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  3. ATE FIN. SERVICES, INC. v. CorsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  4. Adams v. SlonimCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API