Legal Opinion

Adams v. Slonim

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 22, 1991No. 89-7256PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON.

HENDERSON, Circuit Judge:

This appeal involves the interpretation of former D.C.Code section 41-213 (1981),1 which set limits on the financial transactions that a limited partner can conduct with the partnership. The district court concluded that section 41-213 did not bar a limited partner from obtaining a security interest in partnership property but did prevent him from assuming greater priority than the partnership’s general creditors in all instances. We reverse and hold instead that section 41-213 prohibited a limited partner from…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Offshore Logistics, Inc. v. TallentireSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Burlington Northern Railroad v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Stafford v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Grainger v. AntoyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re MurrayUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Schering Corp. v. SullivanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
  3. Bronner v. DugganCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Adams v. SlonimCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  5. Bronner v. DugganDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API