State v. O'BRIEN
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1DissentThornton, J.
Defendant has cited two assignments of error, each of which presents a sufficient ground for reversal. First, at trial, and over objection on the grounds of hearsay, Russel Edmonds was permitted to testify to out-of-court statements allegedly made by Joe Lyda. These statements were to the effect that the paper bag allegedly sold to the defendant con*39tained “* * * some twigs of stems and seeds from * * * the * * * last purchase of Ms marijuana * '* The admission into evidence of the testimony was prejudicial error and grounds for reversal.
State v. Christensen, 3 Or App 442, 444-5, 474 P2d 782…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. DennisOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- State v. McLeanOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Herrmann v. Newark Morning Ledger Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- State v. KendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Patty v. Salem Flouring Mills Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1909
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.