Legal Opinion

Caylor v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 20, 1933PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.

Action for damages for personal injuries. At ten A. m. on February 12, 1928, an automobile driven by plaintiff was struck by an engine of defendant at a public crossing in Fall River, Kansas. The trial was under the applicable law of Kansas pleaded in both the petition and answer. Judgment for $50,000. Defendant appealed.

The petition charged negligence as follows: (a) Defective crossing in that same was not constructed and maintained as provided by statute; (b) failure of the crossing bell to ring; (c) failure to provide a watchman or gates at the crossing, and (d) violation of the last clear…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Dyerson v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. Wehe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Bunton v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Williams v. Iola Electric RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  5. Adams v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Scott v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Trower v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  3. Bollinger v. St. Louis-San Francisco RailwaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  4. Christner v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Eubank v. Kansas City Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API