Legal Opinion
In Re Rose V
California Supreme Court
Decided March 6, 2000No. S062859PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
93 Cal.Rptr.2d 298 (2000)
22 Cal.4th 430
993 P.2d 956
In re Mason Harry ROSE V. on Discipline.
No. S062859.
Supreme Court of California.
March 6, 2000.
James Marvin Weinberg, Santa Monica, for Petitioner.
Robert Rudolph, San Francisco, for Jerome Berg as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Petitioner Mason Harry Rose V.
Marie M. Moffat, Richard J. Zanassi, San Francisco, and Jill A. Sperber, San Francisco, for Respondent State Bar of California.
GEORGE, C.J.
The State Bar Court recommends that we disbar petitioner Mason Harry Rose V. Petitioner has sought review of that recommendation and contends we must issue…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Vandermost v. BowenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012