Legal Opinion

Sautter v. Supreme Conclave

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 16, 1908PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Voobhees, J.

The judgment removed by this writ of error was entered in the Supreme Court after demurrer to a special plea had been sustained by that court. (See opinion, Sautter v. Supreme Conclave, 43 Vroom 325.)

Tire action is founded upon a benefit certificate of the defendant association issued to the plaintiff’s husband, August Sautter.

The declaration sets out that on the 10th day of January, 1899, the certificate in question was issued to the said August Sautter, whereby, the conditions thereof being complied with, *764the defendant promised to pay out…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. O'Neill v. Supreme CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
  2. Roxbury Lodge, No. 184 v. HockingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
  3. Sautter v. Supreme Conclave Improved OrderSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Yager v. AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE ASS'NNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  2. Johnson v. Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of United WorkmenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  3. Clare v. International Brotherhood of Stationary FiremenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  4. Kopacka v. Roman & Greek Catholic Gymnastic Slovak Union SokolPassaic County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API