Legal Opinion

Roxbury Lodge, No. 184 v. Hocking

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1897PublishedCited by 7 opinions

On error to the Morris Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

The defendant in error, who was the plaintiff below, brought this suit against Roxbury Lodge, of which he is a member, to recover “ sick benefits ” from April 20th, 1893, to February 9th, 1895.

The plaintiff’s action is founded upon article 9, section 1 of the by-laws of the lodge, which reads as follows:

“Sec. 1. Every brother who has been a member of this *440lodge for six months, who is not disqualified by article 10 of these laws, shall, in case of being rendered incapable by sickness or disability of following his usual occupation, make…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  2. Minis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  3. State v. Grand Lodge of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
  4. Smith v. Ocean Castle, No. 11, Knights of the Golden EagleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
  5. Holland v. Supreme CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Siena v. Grand Lodge, Etc., Order Sons of ItalyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. Beedie v. Int. Bro. Electrical WorkersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  3. Joseph v. Passaic Hospital Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  4. Post No. 581, American Legion, Department of Texas v. Department of Texas, American LegionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Sautter v. Supreme ConclaveSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API