Legal Opinion

Roach v. Haynes

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 11, 1934No. 4-3489PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.

T. W. Roach, the appellant, is engaged in the work of the construction of levees, and as a part of his equipment a tower machine was in use. This machine is composed of a tower about one hundred feet high with cables, engines, etc., installed thereon. It was used for placing dirt on the levee by means of buckets or scoops moving on cables from a point between the levee and the river. This structure moved on wheels along a track made of cross ties and heavy timbers, constructed in sections called “mats.” As the work progressed the tower was pulled along the track by means of a cable which was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. O'NeillIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. HolmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  3. Johnson v. Mammoth Vein Coal Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  4. Newport Manufacturing Co. v. AltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  5. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. ManganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. BashamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  2. D. F. Jones Construction Co., Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  3. Missouri Pacific Transportation Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  4. Collett v. LoewsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  5. Missouri Pac. R.R., Baldwin, Tr. v. WesterfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API