Legal Opinion

Brenner v. Wright

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 9, 1937No. 11952PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Russell, Chief Justice.

1. Where the vendee in a deed of conveyance founded upon a valuable consideration was described as “Alexander P. Wright, trustee,” no .trust being declared and no beneficiary being named, the word “trustee” is mere surplusage, and the vendee took the title for his own use. Andrews v. Atlanta Real Estate Co., 92 Ga. 260 (18 S. E. 548).

2. The recital in the transfer on the bond for title in this case, executed by the obligee therein, “For value received,” imported payment by the transferee to the transferor of a valuable consideration for the interest of the transferor in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. CourseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Andrews v. Atlanta Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aycock v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Moore v. WellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  3. Brenner v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Florence Young and Alton Pierce v. Randall C. MartinCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2024
  5. Moore v. WellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API