Commonwealth v. Glad

Fox, J.,

— In this motion for a new trial there are four reasons assigned for the same.

*331After consideration of the testimony we see nothing in any of them, except no. 2, that would warrant the granting of the motion. No. 2 reads as follows:

“2. That the court erred in not requiring the Commonwealth’s witness, State Policeman C. E. Waltermyer, to produce his records for examination by counsel for the defendant, inasmuch as the witness had admittedly used such records to refresh his recollection just prior to testifying for the Commonwealth.”

In the cross-examination the Commonwealth’s witness…