Legal Opinion

Stern v. American Railway Express Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 15, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam. .

The trial court having correctly held that as matter of law plaintiff had not complied with the provisions of defendant's *111uniform express receipt in respect to giving defendant notice after a reasonable time for the delivery of the goods had elapsed, as the defendant could not waive the provision of the contract requiring such notice (Georgia, Fla. & Ala. Ry. v. Blish Co., 241 U. S. 190), the complaint should have been dismissed.

We cannot find that the record presented this point for adjudication by the Court of Appeals in Cheney Piano Action Co. v. New York C. & H. R. R. R. Co.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. A. C. Cheney Piano Action Co. v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. KileenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API