Legal Opinion

Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. Kileen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

Plaintiff carrier brings this action to recover freight charges for the transportation of sand and gravel shipped by Wissota Sand &. Gravel Company from its pit at Haugen, Wisconsin, to the defendant Construction Company at Ashland Junction and Dauby, Wisconsin. There were in all eighty-eight separate shipments. The carrier furnished its cars at the Wissota Sand & Gravel Company’s pit when and as ordered by defendant Construction Company. Each shipment moved under a separate bill of lading. The bills of lading were made out at the Wissota Sand & Gravel Company’s pit by its employees. The cars…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. PrescottSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. StarbirdSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Southern Pacific R. Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Appalachian Electric Power Co. v. Virginian Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Herrin Transportation Co. v. Southeastern Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API