Northwestern Natl. Ins. Co. v. Hicks

OPINION

By HAMILTON, PJ.

The main question stressed in the brief and the oral argument by counsel for the Insurance Company concerns the representation that the cost of the automobile was $1704, and that this was a material warranty, and, therefore, the policy was void and no recovery could bs had under it.

The evidence as to the basis for filing the cost is in the record, which discloses that the husband of Mrs. Hicks, the assured,' made a deal with an Auburn automobile dealer for the automobile in question, and that the list price during the year in which the model was used was $2175. This was…