Legal Opinion

Northwestern Nat'l Insurance v. Ferstman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVINE, PJ.

The defendant in error relies upon *§9586 GC, which provides as follows:

“A person who- solicits insurance and procures the application therefor, shall be held to-be the agent of the party, company, or association, thereafter issuing a policy upon upon such application or a renewal thereof, anything in the application or the policy to the contrary notwithstanding.”

It is contended on the strength of said §9586 GC, that such knowledge as the soliciting agent obtained about the title of the property insured at the time or before the issuance of the policy is, as a matter of law,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Doe ex dem. Shelton v. HamiltonMississippi Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nellas v. Manufacturers Casualty Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Northwestern Natl. Ins. Co. v. HicksOhio Court of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API