Legal Opinion
Northwestern Nat'l Insurance v. Ferstman
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 21, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVINE, PJ.
The defendant in error relies upon *§9586 GC, which provides as follows:
“A person who- solicits insurance and procures the application therefor, shall be held to-be the agent of the party, company, or association, thereafter issuing a policy upon upon such application or a renewal thereof, anything in the application or the policy to the contrary notwithstanding.”
It is contended on the strength of said §9586 GC, that such knowledge as the soliciting agent obtained about the title of the property insured at the time or before the issuance of the policy is, as a matter of law,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Doe ex dem. Shelton v. HamiltonMississippi Supreme Court · 1852
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nellas v. Manufacturers Casualty Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1953
- Northwestern Natl. Ins. Co. v. HicksOhio Court of Appeals · 1935