Legal Opinion

Van Jacobs v. Parikh

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 10, 1981No. 80-1648PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNAMARA

Third-party plaintiff, Roper Corporation, appeals from the trial court’s order dismissing its third-party complaint against Jitendra Parikh. Parikh, Roper and others not relevant here, had been joined as defendants in a wrongful death action brought by Mary Van Jacobs whose husband died as a result of a collision between an automobile operated by Parikh and a motorcycle driven by deceased. At the time of the collision, deceased was wearing a helmet manufactured by Roper Helmets, a division of Roper. Van Jacobs settled with Parikh for $10,000, the limits of his insurance policy, and a covenant…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Skinner v. Reed-Prentice Division Package MacHinery Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Gertz v. CampbellIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Williams MacHine & Tool Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Muhlbauer v. KruzelIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Gulf, Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. Arthur Dixon Transfer Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Allison v. Shell Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Heinrich v. Peabody International Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1984
  3. LeMaster v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. Van Slambrouck v. Economy Baler Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Bristow v. Griffitts Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API