Legal Opinion

Sandel v. ATP Oil & Gas Corp.

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided October 30, 2007No. 14-06-00323-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LESLIE B. YATES, Justice.

Appellant Charles Sandel appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee ATP Oil & Gas Corporation (“ATP”). We affirm.

BACKGROUND

ATP, an oil and gas production company, hired Sandel on April 26, 1999 as its Director of Land and Associate Counsel. Pursuant to its stock option plans, ATP periodically offered its employees stock options. During his employment, ATP offered Sandel three grants of stock options. In 1999 and 2000, ATP granted Sandel stock options, and he signed a “Nonquali-fied Stock Option Agreement” as required by ATP in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Science Spectrum, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison County Housing Finance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Roark v. STALLWORTH OIL AND GAS, INCTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. English v. FischerTexas Supreme Court · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Trevino & Associates Mechanical, L.P. and Mike Trevino. Sr. v. the Frost National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
  2. Moore v. Altra Energy Technologies, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  3. Corpus Christi Day Cruise, LLC v. Christus Spohn Health System Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  4. M7 CAPITAL LLC v. Miller, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  5. Jones v. Landry's Seafood Inn & Oyster Bar-Galveston, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API