Legal Opinion

United States v. Hopkins

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided November 8, 1976No. CM 434274PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

DONAHUE, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by a court with members of signing an official record with intent to deceive, larceny (four specifications), forgery, and falsely making a military identification card with intent to defraud in violation of Articles 107,121, 123 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 907, 921, 923, and 934, respectively. The approved sentence is set forth above. Counsel for both parties presented excellent briefs and oral arguments to the Court.

I. Jurisdiction

In his first assignment of error, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. O'Callahan v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Relford v. Commandant, US Disciplinary Barracks, Fort LeavenworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. BurtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  4. United States v. MooreUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  5. United States v. UhlmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. HopkinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  2. United States v. StubbsU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API