Legal Opinion

United States Trust Co. v. Frelinghuysen

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 29, 1942PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoughran, J.

Prior to September 1, 1935, the former section 342 of the Civil Practice Act made this provision: “A seal upon an executory instrument is only presumptive evidence of a sufficient consideration, which may be rebutted as if the instrument was not sealed.” This case presents questions as to the scope and effect of that former text.

The action is one for a judgment declaring the respective rights and legal relations of the parties under a so-called collateral bond which the defendants delivered to the plaintiff on February 16, 1932. This bond is an instrument under seal. Plaintiff won at Special…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morgan v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Baird v. BairdNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Cochran v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Vrooman v. PhelpsNew York Supreme Court · 1807
  5. Dorr v. MunsellNew York Supreme Court · 1816

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Preston v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  2. United States Trust Co. v. FrelinghuysenNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Preston v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  4. United States Trust Company v. FrelinghuysenNew York Court of Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API